Dan Checkoway says he wouldn't bother installing one again. I have been back and forth on the subject and am currently leaning TOWARDS installing one. After all, it IS a -7 and upside down stuff is a possibility.
What do you want to do John? Do you want to do inverted (prolonged zero or negative G stuff) or do you only want to do positive G stuff. If negative then you have to ask how long you are going to be upside down. Are you using an injected engine with inverted oil ?
-- John
http://www.rivetbangers.com - Now integrating web and mail!
Current Build: 2 years into a beautiful little girl
Well, ya see... like I said, mostly positive G stuff. But, one I got these suckers all sealed up, full o' gas and airborne and I change my mind... it's too late.
I may just huck one in for the $hit$ and giggles of it all.
Engine choices are really quite open right now for me. That goes for the propellor too. This explains why I haven't said so much as "BOO" in the recent prop topic. I don't have a firm decision yet.
I am just wondering what others did and trying to run some hypotheticals in my head.
Opinions?
Thoughts?
Experiences?
CJ
RV-7
Garmin G3X with VP-X & a TMX-IO-360 with G3i
It's all over but the flying! 800+ hours in only 3 years!
I guess my only point was that I believe your floppy tube problem is null and void if you put a carbed engine on the plane anyway with the associated fuel delivery problem. Hey, if you want them as a just in case, go ahead. Its your plane, do what you feel inclined to do buddy. I have to hush up after that cause I'm building a 9A. You know, the painsy airplane that wont go upside down that any non-real-man can fly because the third wheel is in the front.
http://www.rivetbangers.com - Now integrating web and mail!
Current Build: 2 years into a beautiful little girl
probably just long enough for the fuel line to drain out, about 5 saeconds or less. I put a flop tube in the left tank to take care of that problem!
Dan
While I don't plan to spend all day inverted, I did manage to put one in on my left tank. I figure I'll placard/log it as the tank to be on for inverted flights of fancy.
I decided to go regular pickup in the right tank, even though I did buy the extra flop tube. I changed my mind on doing both so that I might get more useable fuel out of the right tank since the regular pick-up sits lower.
I'd say if your thinking about it and like doing some aerobatics, then just put one flop tube in.
spike wrote:........ I have to hush up after that cause I'm building a 9A. You know, the painsy airplane that wont go upside down that any.........too shameful to quote........
Spike, I hope I am not responsible for making you feel this way I really am a milk and chocolate chip cookie kinda guy. I think it's only the 3% irresponsible people of society that are wild and crazy. Most of them just happen to be building RV's.
I put flop tubes in both tanks. I hate asymmetrical things so I do both sides the same. I figure it gives me the option of putting in inverted oil in the future, if I do much inverted flight. I figure it is easy to put in standard pickups in the future, but not flop tubes,l so I opted for flop tubes to start out. I like to build things so that I have the most options for the future.
Here's another reason for inverted flight. Spam can shooting...
[quoted from Budd Davisson's review of a Clipped Cub]
A goodly number of real hotrods have been built around the clipped Cub with 150 and 180 Lycomings shoe-horned up front...... What a blast it would be to build a 180 hp J-3 with T-craft wings. You'd use the original style open cowl, paint it yellow with the black lightning bolt and then go looking for Arrows and Cutlasses. A 180 clipped Cub is good for 160 mph in cruise and a 3,000 fpm rate of climb, or better. You'd have guys with Wichita sheet iron birds vehement at their mechanics because this dumb yellow Cub just walked away from them . . . upside down.
Last edited by aerial on Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.