Got the Aileron Pushrods welded!
- captain_john
- Sparky
- Posts: 5880
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 9:17 am
- Location: KPYM
Hmmmm, that is an interesting passage from the "bible". I ran it past a friend of mine who is probably one of the most highly qualified and certified welding inspector/guru around.
He and I both agree that the reason they guard against the practice of filing or otherwise removing material from the weld after it has been made is because without good initial penetration (difficult to prove in the field without destructive testing) the strength could be affected.
Good penetration begins with good prep. That means beveling the faces of the substrate materials and then penetrating additionally with the heat applied with the filler material.
In our estimation, the Feds would rather have you leave the additional material in place because they are assuming the worst case scenario happened in the field prior to welding... no beveled surfaces and possible poor penetration.
If we were assured of proper technique, this additional material could certainly be removed.
Will, Don't think that my feathers are ruffled, as I am sure yours aren't either. We are just dwelling in the minutia of aircraft building and that is what makes our planes better than spam cans!
I thought you were doing high voltage wiring! If you were, we could drink the cold ones WHILE we worked!
...and Smitty, maybe he had poor penetration and knows it?
I just like using that word, PENETRATION!
...and make sure you LUBE the end!
CJ
He and I both agree that the reason they guard against the practice of filing or otherwise removing material from the weld after it has been made is because without good initial penetration (difficult to prove in the field without destructive testing) the strength could be affected.
Good penetration begins with good prep. That means beveling the faces of the substrate materials and then penetrating additionally with the heat applied with the filler material.
In our estimation, the Feds would rather have you leave the additional material in place because they are assuming the worst case scenario happened in the field prior to welding... no beveled surfaces and possible poor penetration.
If we were assured of proper technique, this additional material could certainly be removed.
Will, Don't think that my feathers are ruffled, as I am sure yours aren't either. We are just dwelling in the minutia of aircraft building and that is what makes our planes better than spam cans!
I thought you were doing high voltage wiring! If you were, we could drink the cold ones WHILE we worked!

...and Smitty, maybe he had poor penetration and knows it?

I just like using that word, PENETRATION!
...and make sure you LUBE the end!

RV-7
Garmin G3X with VP-X & a TMX-IO-360 with G3i
It's all over but the flying! 800+ hours in only 3 years!
Garmin G3X with VP-X & a TMX-IO-360 with G3i
It's all over but the flying! 800+ hours in only 3 years!
most likely truecaptain_john wrote:He and I both agree that the reason they guard against the practice of filing or otherwise removing material from the weld after it has been made is because without good initial penetration (difficult to prove in the field without destructive testing) the strength could be affected.
well material this thin doesnt require bevelingcaptain_john wrote: Good penetration begins with good prep. That means beveling the faces of the substrate materials and then penetrating additionally with the heat applied with the filler material.
again probly true but im certain they have doen extensive testin to come to this reasoning...i mean even at the ESAB cutting/welding center here at the college do all kind of x-ray tesing and destructive testing. come to think of it, if a students project cant be bent 180 deg after grinding off the weld as mentioned they fail the practical. and get to start over...you and i know its all about PENETRATION.captain_john wrote:
In our estimation, the Feds would rather have you leave the additional material in place because they are assuming the worst case scenario happened in the field prior to welding... no beveled surfaces and possible poor penetration.

true truecaptain_john wrote: If we were assured of proper technique, this additional material could certainly be removed..
no doubt my friendcaptain_john wrote: Will, Don't think that my feathers are ruffled, as I am sure yours aren't either. We are just dwelling in the minutia of aircraft building and that is what makes our planes better than spam cans!
i leave that stuff to my friend, 220 is as high as i go. something about the black wire being hot is stupidcaptain_john wrote: I thought you were doing high voltage wiring! If you were, we could drink the cold ones WHILE we worked!

william....don't let it beat you down, you are stronger than you think.
William,
Thank you for finding the reference...I knew it was in there but could not put my finger on it. Clearly, this applies to any load bearing steel structure which is designed to carry critical loads...like the aileron pushrods...
I will be inspecting my pushrod welds on a regular basis!
Thank you for finding the reference...I knew it was in there but could not put my finger on it. Clearly, this applies to any load bearing steel structure which is designed to carry critical loads...like the aileron pushrods...
I will be inspecting my pushrod welds on a regular basis!
Bret Smith
9A Flying (N16BL)
Blue Ridge, GA
http://www.FlightInnovations.com
APRS Tracking: http://www.flightinnovations.com/tracking.html
9A Flying (N16BL)
Blue Ridge, GA
http://www.FlightInnovations.com
APRS Tracking: http://www.flightinnovations.com/tracking.html
- captain_john
- Sparky
- Posts: 5880
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 9:17 am
- Location: KPYM
or
maybe he is mister mom...i use that line till this day except i go wth 220 221 whatever it takes....gotta love it...
i tried out for the job but my wife said no
i tried out for the job but my wife said no

william....don't let it beat you down, you are stronger than you think.
- captain_john
- Sparky
- Posts: 5880
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 9:17 am
- Location: KPYM
No, not really a movie buff. I just have heard them all being in the trade.
Back in the day when I pulled out my right angle drill, everyone would ask me if I had seen the movie Body Double. To this day I haven't but I hear it has a a murderer who uses an electrician's drill to kill people.
Dunno... Never saw it.
CJ
Back in the day when I pulled out my right angle drill, everyone would ask me if I had seen the movie Body Double. To this day I haven't but I hear it has a a murderer who uses an electrician's drill to kill people.
Dunno... Never saw it.

RV-7
Garmin G3X with VP-X & a TMX-IO-360 with G3i
It's all over but the flying! 800+ hours in only 3 years!
Garmin G3X with VP-X & a TMX-IO-360 with G3i
It's all over but the flying! 800+ hours in only 3 years!
- captain_john
- Sparky
- Posts: 5880
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 9:17 am
- Location: KPYM
thanks 
I drilled a 3/32" hole in the pushrod near one end before welding the end... it really is pretty necessary, otherwise the heat makes the air inside the tube expand, and it pops little holes in the weld pool. I'm going to pour linseed oil in the holes and then weld up the hole. After that, I'll mask off the threads and prime and paint the pushrods.
I also put my aileron bellcrank together for the left wing.

I drilled a 3/32" hole in the pushrod near one end before welding the end... it really is pretty necessary, otherwise the heat makes the air inside the tube expand, and it pops little holes in the weld pool. I'm going to pour linseed oil in the holes and then weld up the hole. After that, I'll mask off the threads and prime and paint the pushrods.
I also put my aileron bellcrank together for the left wing.
Ian
RV-7 SB, chugging toward final assembly
IO-360-C1C 200hp obtained.
Hartzell BA prop received.
James Cowl ordered.
N773WW reserved!
RV-7 SB, chugging toward final assembly
IO-360-C1C 200hp obtained.
Hartzell BA prop received.
James Cowl ordered.
N773WW reserved!
man
i hate to keep on being the "doubting thomas/ nervous nellie" but dont you think the heat treat on the threaded portion is rendered useless with the welding process? doesnt this need to be reheat treated? that is what i was taught in school. 

Last edited by weezbad on Mon Jan 14, 2008 6:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
william....don't let it beat you down, you are stronger than you think.
- captain_john
- Sparky
- Posts: 5880
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2004 9:17 am
- Location: KPYM
Well Will, from what I have learned, the weld usually fails in the HAA (Heat Affected Area). This is rarely the weld itself, but the surrounding material, like you said.
When you temper a metal, you bring it all up to temperature and cool it all together. Soooo, ya. We are on the same page.
The question is, need these be tempered?
I dunno?
CJ
When you temper a metal, you bring it all up to temperature and cool it all together. Soooo, ya. We are on the same page.
The question is, need these be tempered?
I dunno?

RV-7
Garmin G3X with VP-X & a TMX-IO-360 with G3i
It's all over but the flying! 800+ hours in only 3 years!
Garmin G3X with VP-X & a TMX-IO-360 with G3i
It's all over but the flying! 800+ hours in only 3 years!
-
- Chief Rivet Banger
- Posts: 4013
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 8:40 pm
- Location: Baltimore, MD
- Contact:
Yeah, it appears that the parens are screwing up the parser. Typical escape sequences dont seem to help. Ill have to look at the code itself to see if there is a way around it.
Spike
Spike
http://www.rivetbangers.com - Now integrating web and mail!
Current Build: 2 years into a beautiful little girl
Current Build: 2 years into a beautiful little girl
well
the rod ends are over half the way screwed in so this means if one came loose it couldnt unthread it self... it would bottom in the other end bearing first... i still would love to have them saftied somehow..
william....don't let it beat you down, you are stronger than you think.
Here's how I saftied my elevator push tube (the little one, same as the aileron push tube)...

The instructions say that if the threads can't be engaged half way or more, that some means of safetying them is needed.
This will work even if you have more than half engaged, and want peace of mind. I did this because I had less than half the threads engaged on either end.
I took some quarter inch ID AL tubing, cut it in half, and then cut each half to the length I needed. The half AL tube simply rests on top of the threads, then I zip tied them to the threads. I also torque sealed the nut for easy inspection. The nuts can't move unless both zip ties fail, and the torque seal lets go...

The instructions say that if the threads can't be engaged half way or more, that some means of safetying them is needed.
This will work even if you have more than half engaged, and want peace of mind. I did this because I had less than half the threads engaged on either end.
I took some quarter inch ID AL tubing, cut it in half, and then cut each half to the length I needed. The half AL tube simply rests on top of the threads, then I zip tied them to the threads. I also torque sealed the nut for easy inspection. The nuts can't move unless both zip ties fail, and the torque seal lets go...